Thanks BBC news for your in depth reporting and totally non-biased review of the government's decision to post what you describe as "sharp and witty" anti-drug ads on youtube.com. Recently, LEAP blogged and posted a press release referencing the determination by independent evaluating company Westat Inc. that these ads not only failed to inhibit drug use but actually exacerbated the problem.
"We want people to take this issue seriously and get the right facts about illegal drug use," says Raphael Lemaitre from the White House Drugs Office of the anti-drugs ads. Interesting statement from a representative of an organization that daily publicizes total misrepresentations of facts about illicit drugs and warps statistical data to fit their ill conceived points. Moreover, the very advertisement campaigns being discussed in this particular context rarely, if ever, detail the effects of the drugs in question, opting instead to utilize "sharper and wittier" tactics such as having a kid sprint away from a dog or shove his fist in his mouth and state, "I'm am idiot. I'm doing stupid things, and that ain't me."
The so-called MTV generation may be precocious and saavy but it's a bit much to expect anyone to glean anything intelligible about drug use from these adverts. Fortunately, it appears that some are educated about the propaganda generated by government controlled prohibitionist agencies. "When people see that these videos are from the government they'll probably just back-click out of them," 14-year-old Axel Kabundji said.
Unfortunately it appears that there are still others who wish to use more insidious tactics such as Michael Cornfield, professor of political management at George Washington University. "The government should start recruiting young people to use MySpace, the social networking website," he says. "To spread the anti-drugs message, peer pressure is always more effective than suggestions from the government."
Does this sound eerily 1984-esque to anyone else?
read the full text of the original article below:
YouTube used for 'war on drugs'
By Nick Miles BBC News, Washington |
Some teenagers were sceptical about the government's tactics |
Now the White House is using one of the internet's fastest growing websites to spread its anti-drugs message.
The site, YouTube, allows people to put video material on the web that can then be watched by anyone with access to a computer and some simple software.
The site shows more than 100 million videos a day.
It is particularly popular amongst teenagers and there is an anti-establishment feel to many of the videos posted on it.
When, for example, you type in the key word "marijuana", hundreds of clips come up advocating its use.
The government's anti-drugs messages are now competing for attention alongside them.
The theme of many of them is how teenagers can avoid caving in to peer pressure.
Sharp and witty
One shows a guard dog at a lumber yard chasing a teenage boy. A voiceover from the boy tells us that his friends persuaded him to smoke a joint and then try to outrun the dog.
"I'm am idiot. I'm doing stupid things, and that ain't me," he says.
Another shows a group of teenage boys lounging on a couch after having smoked marijuana. One of their friends abstains, and tells the audience all the things that he could be doing whilst his friends lounge around in a drug-induced haze.
The videos are sharp and witty and they have all previously been aired on television stations in America.
"This has already been worth it because we are making people feel more connected to the government and this has not cost us a cent, it has been a good policy," says Raphael Lemaitre from the White House Drugs Office.
"We want people to take this issue seriously and get the right facts about illegal drug use."
Over the last 20 years government figures show a 30% reduction in the number of people regularly using illegal drugs - that is more than 7m fewer users.
But teenage drug use has not fallen as rapidly.
In the computer room at a youth club in Silver Springs near Washington, there is a degree of scepticism about the government campaign on YouTube.
"When people see that these videos are from the government they'll probably just back-click out of them," 14-year-old Axel Kabundji tells me.
"People will say: 'What's the government ever done for me? Forget it'."
'Counter-productive'
Fifteen-year-old Gabriel Sanchez was slightly more positive. "Maybe someone might stumble across one of these messages and get something out of it," he tells me.
It is hardly a ringing endorsement and that comes as no surprise to Michael Cornfield, professor of political management at George Washington University.
"All the research suggests that the more anti-drugs ads you show teenagers, the more likely they are to actually take them. When the government says something is bad, it's seen as cool," he says.
Mr Cornfield, who has studied how the internet is used for influencing social trends for more than a decade, believes that there could be a more effective anti-drugs strategy.
"The government should start recruiting young people to use MySpace, the social networking website," he says.
"To spread the anti-drugs message, peer pressure is always more effective than suggestions from the government."